Price and performance details for the ZX C-960 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.
Videocard Category: Desktop
Other names: ZX C-960
Videocard First Benchmarked: 2024-10-09
G3DMark/Price: NA
Overall Rank: 2172
Last Price Change: NA
DirectX 9 | 4 Frames/Sec |
---|---|
DirectX 10 | 8 Frames/Sec |
DirectX 11 | 1 Frames/Sec |
DirectX 12 | 0 Frames/Sec |
GPU Compute | 13 Ops/Sec |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3080 | 25,234 | |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 22,373 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 20,506 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | 17,003 | |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 14,150 | |
GeForce GTX 1070 | 13,501 | |
GeForce GTX 1060 | 10,075 | |
GeForce GTX 1650 | 7,874 | |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 6,313 | |
ZX C-960 | 83 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
GeForce GTX 1650 | 61.23 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | 60.73 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 60.31 | |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 45.66 | |
GeForce RTX 3080 | 37.11 | |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 34.34 | |
GeForce GTX 1060 | 29.63 | |
GeForce GTX 1070 | 25.47 | |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 14.73 | |
ZX C-960 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
BL2214844 - Oct 09 2024 | 83 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
ZX C-960 | 83 | |
GeForce RTX 4090 vs ZX C-960 | 38,570 (+46379.6%) | |
GeForce RTX 4080 vs ZX C-960 | 34,617 (+41616.4%) | |
RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs ZX C-960 | 34,569 (+41557.7%) | |
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs ZX C-960 | 34,164 (+41069.8%) | |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs ZX C-960 | 31,797 (+38218.2%) | |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ZX C-960 | 31,657 (+38049.0%) | |
Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs ZX C-960 | 31,004 (+37261.7%) | |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs ZX C-960 | 30,184 (+36274.4%) | |
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs ZX C-960 | 29,701 (+35692.4%) | |
Radeon RX 7900 XT vs ZX C-960 | 28,731 (+34523.3%) | |
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs ZX C-960 | 28,184 (+33863.2%) | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |