Price and performance details for the ZX C-960 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.
Videocard Category: Desktop
Other names: ZX C-960
Videocard First Benchmarked: 2024-10-09
G3DMark/Price: NA
Overall Rank: NA
Last Price Change: NA
DirectX 9 | 4 Frames/Sec |
---|---|
DirectX 10 | 8 Frames/Sec |
DirectX 11 | 1 Frames/Sec |
DirectX 12 | 0 Frames/Sec |
GPU Compute | 13 Ops/Sec |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3080 | 25,228 | |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 22,361 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 20,490 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | 16,985 | |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 14,149 | |
GeForce GTX 1070 | 13,497 | |
GeForce GTX 1060 | 10,077 | |
GeForce GTX 1650 | 7,870 | |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 6,316 | |
ZX C-960 | 83 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
GeForce RTX 3060 12GB | 59.66 | |
GeForce GTX 1650 | 52.47 | |
GeForce RTX 3070 | 45.63 | |
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 37.26 | |
GeForce RTX 2060 | 37.13 | |
GeForce RTX 3080 | 37.10 | |
GeForce GTX 1060 | 29.64 | |
GeForce GTX 1070 | 25.47 | |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | 14.75 | |
ZX C-960 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
BL2214844 - Oct 09 2024 | 83 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |
Videocard | Average G3D Mark | |
---|---|---|
ZX C-960 | 83 | |
GeForce RTX 4090 vs ZX C-960 | 38,581 (+46393.2%) | |
GeForce RTX 4080 vs ZX C-960 | 34,627 (+41628.2%) | |
RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs ZX C-960 | 34,569 (+41557.7%) | |
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs ZX C-960 | 34,294 (+41227.3%) | |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs ZX C-960 | 31,828 (+38254.6%) | |
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs ZX C-960 | 31,725 (+38130.5%) | |
Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs ZX C-960 | 31,069 (+37340.3%) | |
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER vs ZX C-960 | 30,154 (+36237.3%) | |
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs ZX C-960 | 29,671 (+35656.1%) | |
Radeon RX 7900 XT vs ZX C-960 | 28,851 (+34668.0%) | |
Radeon RX 6950 XT vs ZX C-960 | 28,152 (+33825.1%) | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2024 |